Is This for Real? When Courts Pretend to Decide What God Already Defined

True or False

True or False

Is this for real?

We have reached a moment in American history where the Supreme Court of the United States is being asked – seriously – to weigh arguments over who is a man and who is a woman. Not policy. Not procedure. Not jurisdiction. But biological reality itself.

Let that sink in.

For all of human history, across every civilization, culture, religion, and scientific discipline, the distinction between male and female has been a settled matter. It was not controversial. It was not political. It was not debated in courtrooms. It was recognized as a fundamental truth of human existence.

Now, in 2026 America, lawyers stand before the highest court in the land and argue that sex is malleable, subjective, self-declared, and open to reinterpretation by the state.

This is not progress. This is insanity.

An Urgent Message from Sister Sara – Please Watch

Let’s be clear: no court, no legislature, no medical board, and no activist movement has the authority to redefine what it means to be male or female. God decided that long before there were courts, constitutions, or legal briefs. “Male and female He created them” is not poetry – it is a statement of reality rooted in natural law, biology, and observable fact.

Biologically, there are two sexes: male and female. This is determined at conception, encoded in chromosomes, and expressed in every cell of the human body. XX or XY. That is not ideology. That is science. No amount of wordplay, linguistic gymnastics, or legal maneuvering changes this.

And yet here we are – listening to arguments that twist language beyond recognition. “Sex” becomes “assigned at birth.” “Gender” becomes a feeling. Words are stretched, redefined, emptied of meaning, all in service of an ideology that demands reality bend to subjective perception.

This is not compassion. It is deception.

The Catholic Church has been absolutely clear on this matter – not out of cruelty, not out of fear, but out of love for truth and love for the human person. To deny biological reality is to deny the integrity of the human body itself. It fractures the unity between body and soul and replaces truth with confusion. That confusion does not liberate people; it harms them.

What is most alarming is not that activists believe this. It is that the legal system is being asked to arbitrate it.

Courts exist to interpret law – not to redefine reality. Judges are not gods. They do not possess the authority to declare that men can become women or that women can become men. When courts attempt to rule on what is fundamentally a metaphysical and biological truth, they step far beyond their mandate and into dangerous territory.

If the Supreme Court can be used to redefine sex, what comes next? Can it redefine motherhood? Fatherhood? Marriage? Human life itself? Once truth becomes negotiable, everything becomes vulnerable to the will of power.

This is why this moment matters.

This is not about denying the dignity of any person. Every human being deserves respect, compassion, and care. But dignity does not require us to deny truth. Love does not require us to lie. And justice does not require us to pretend that biological reality is optional.

I will not accept a ruling – under any circumstances – that claims a court can decide what a man or a woman is. That authority belongs to neither judges nor governments. It belongs to God and is confirmed by nature itself.

This case should never have reached the Supreme Court. The very fact that it has is a sign of how far we have drifted from reason, truth, and moral clarity.

This is not just stupid. It is dangerous. It is morally wrong. And it must be said plainly: a society that asks courts to decide what God already defined is a society in deep spiritual and intellectual crisis.

Truth does not need a ruling. It simply needs to be defended.

And now is the time to defend it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *