In a world accustomed to loud leaders and polarized politics, Pope Leo XIV’s understated approach to the papacy is beginning to draw notice, even from secular observers. Writing in The Atlantic, one commentator described his as a “quiet American papacy,” a surprising contrast to the stereotype of bold, outspoken American leadership and the global fanfare that greeted his election earlier this year, according to The Atlantic.
Though low-profile, Leo’s first six months as pope have been far from idle. As The Atlantic notes, “In June, he convened tech leaders to discuss the dangers that the unchecked expansion of AI pose to human dignity.” Over the summer, he gave his first major interview affirming the Church’s teaching on human sexuality while emphasizing “a commitment to welcoming LGBTQ Catholics.” He has also “repeatedly called for peace in Ukraine and the Middle East” and issued his first major teaching document, Dilexi Te, which condemned “the unrestrained pursuit of wealth.” In it, Leo warns that “a culture still persists—sometimes well disguised—that discards others without even realizing it, and tolerates with indifference that millions of people die of hunger or survive in conditions unfit for human beings,” according to The Atlantic.
Despite these efforts, Leo has not dominated global headlines the way his predecessor did. Pope Francis’s early days were filled with symbolic gestures that captured the world’s imagination—personally paying his hotel bill, living in the modest Vatican guesthouse, and washing the feet of inmates. As The Atlantic observes, Francis’s famous question—“Who am I to judge?”—came to define his pontificate, sparking enthusiasm and division alike. Leo, by contrast, seems intent on tempering the noise, not amplifying it.
That restraint extends even to his relationship with President Donald Trump. The Atlantic reports that while Pope Francis directly criticized Trump’s border policies, calling them “not Christian,” Pope Leo “hasn’t referred to Trump himself.” Instead, he has described “America’s handling of immigrants as ‘inhuman’” and urged bishops to defend the vulnerable, lamenting the “physical and spiritual mistreatment of migrants.”
Some commentators, such as conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat, have warned that Leo’s approach risks “vagueness and vapor,” potentially losing moral clarity in a world hungry for strong voices. Yet, as The Atlantic argues, the pope’s quietness might be deliberate—a corrective to the “one-man rule” mentality shaping today’s global politics. “I don’t see my primary role as trying to be the solver of the world’s problems,” Leo himself explained. “I don’t see my role as that at all, really, although I think that the Church has a voice, a message that needs to continue to be preached, to be spoken and spoken loudly,” according to the report.
This paradox—speaking loudly through quietness—may be the defining feature of Leo XIV’s early papacy. His subtlety is not weakness but an invitation: a call for Catholics to look beyond headlines and rediscover their own responsibility to act. As The Atlantic concludes, Leo’s silence might not signal withdrawal but rather “a provocation: Pay less attention to the Attilas of the present age, and more to what we ourselves are doing and failing to do.”
Your support brings the truth to the world.
Catholic Online News exists because of donors like you. We are 100% funded by people who believe the world deserves real, uncensored news rooted in faith and truth — not corporate agendas. Your gift ensures millions can continue to access the news they can trust — stories that defend life, faith, family, and freedom.
When truth is silenced, your support speaks louder.
