Elon Musk has drawn renewed attention to the scale of federal funding received by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops for migrant and refugee services, prompting debate over the relationship between government grants and the bishops’ advocacy on immigration.
According to analysis of the USCCB’s fiscal year 2024 audit cited by LifeSiteNews, Effort News founder Brian Chau reported that the bishops’ conference received $180.4 million from government contracts and grants, representing 81.8% of its revenue. Chau said the government funding was connected to Migration and Refugee Services.
“The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is almost entirely funded by government refugee resettlement grants. It’s over 80% of their revenue,” an X user wrote in a post highlighted by LifeSiteNews. Musk responded simply, “Wow.”
Chau also pointed to the prominence of Migration and Refugee Services within the conference’s expenses. According to his analysis quoted by LifeSiteNews, “Migration and Refugee Services (MRS) make up the vast majority of USCCB operating expenses.”
He further reported that MRS accounted for $13.4 million of $36.6 million in USCCB salaries, taxes and benefits.
The figures sparked disagreement over what conclusions Catholics should draw from the bishops’ reliance on federal migration grants.
Father Matthew P. Schneider, a theology professor at Holy Apostles College and Seminary, objected that the federal program at issue has since been canceled and that the funding did not pay for every aspect of the bishops’ refugee work or their other activities, according to LifeSiteNews.
The Leonine Institute responded that the historical level of government support remained significant to the discussion.
“Surely, it’s at least worth a passing comment that this was the case for quite some time,” the institute wrote, according to LifeSiteNews. “It’s reasonable to point out that fully 80% of the USCCB’s revenue was at least promised by migration grants, given how vocal the bishops are about importing as many people into the US as possible.”
The dispute over funding comes amid a broader Catholic debate about immigration enforcement and the moral obligations of governments toward migrants.
LifeSiteNews reported that, as of February 2025, the USCCB and Catholic Charities had received $449 million in federal funds connected to helping resettle unaccompanied migrant children. According to the outlet, the USCCB also sued the Trump administration that month in an effort to prevent the cancellation of federal funding.
The bishops’ conference has simultaneously taken public positions opposing several elements of the Trump administration’s immigration agenda. According to LifeSiteNews, the USCCB filed an amicus brief in February arguing that ending automatic recognition of citizenship for U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants would “deny the dignity of the human person and harm innocent children.”
Texas Bishop Daniel Flores, who was elected USCCB vice president last year, has also strongly criticized mass deportation. LifeSiteNews reported that Flores described participation in such deportations as “formal cooperation in intrinsic evil,” comparing it with “driving someone to an abortion clinic.”
Not every prominent Catholic voice, however, has accepted the idea that support for immigrants requires opposition to strong border enforcement.
Bishop Robert Barron argued in March that Catholics should avoid portraying those who favor immigration enforcement as morally deficient merely because they support stricter enforcement of the law.
“We can’t simply fall for the simplistic view that an open border is humanitarian, that an open border is kind to the stranger,” Barron said, according to LifeSiteNews.
“An open border also produces enormous moral problems,” he continued. “It’s not just, well, the bad guy, Republicans, who want to enforce immigration laws. It’s Republicans for very good moral reasons who want to enforce immigration law.”
The renewed scrutiny of the USCCB’s finances therefore touches on two distinct questions for Catholics: the prudential debate over immigration policy itself and the degree to which extensive government funding should factor into an assessment of institutional advocacy.
The financial figures alone do not establish the motives behind the bishops’ immigration positions. But the size of the federal grants has become part of the public debate surrounding the conference, particularly as Catholics continue to wrestle with how the Church’s concern for migrants should be applied alongside a government’s responsibility to enforce its laws and regulate its borders.
Your support brings the truth to the world.
Catholic Online News exists because of donors like you. We are 100% funded by people who believe the world deserves real, uncensored news rooted in faith and truth — not corporate agendas. Your gift ensures millions can continue to access the news they can trust — stories that defend life, faith, family, and freedom.
When truth is silenced, your support speaks louder.
